Text size

Baptism RecordsEnglish + GermanHeld by an archive

390648

Transcript and translation

Uncertain readings are marked [?] or set in brackets; words that could not be read are marked as such. Each transcript is shown as written, with its transcriber’s notes.

The record

Page 115/286 - 1789
Screenshot 2026-08-27 at 1.33.49 PM

Linse, 6th of January. The miller Johann Heinrich Wesemann's daughter. The mother, Marie Christine, aged 34. Witnesses: the citizen Settemeier; Sporleder, of Linse; [ ] Anna. Baptized the 11th [of January].

Named: Caroline Louise.

Now, your question. Look at what lines up against the earlier Linse entries:

Occupation: "der Müller" — the miller — identical to entry 10, where you had Heinrich Wäßemann, der Müller, and Christine Kampen.

Location: Linse, same as entry 10.

Given names: Johann Heinrich, matching.

Wife's age: 33 in entry 10, 34 here. If this entry falls roughly a year later, that's exactly the progression you'd expect from the same woman aging one year.

Wife's name: "Christine Kampen" in entry 10 versus "Marie Christine" here. That's not a contradiction — it reads like her full given name is Marie Christine, with Kampen being her maiden surname, included in some entries and dropped in others, which is common practice across this register (you've seen several instances of the scribe being inconsistent about including maiden names).

Existing children: George Ludewig, Ernst Heinrich, and Johann Ernst already recorded for this couple. Caroline Louise as a fourth child, and now a daughter after three sons, fits cleanly.

Everything points to this being the same man, same household, recorded once as Wäßemann and once as Wesemann — which means the spelling genuinely wavered within a single family's own baptismal records, by the same or a different clergyman, within what looks like a short span of years. That's a materially different conclusion than what you were testing earlier today, where Wasmann and Wäsemann/Wesemann kept resolving as separate families. Here, the occupation-plus-location-plus-wife's-age triangulation is specific enough that I don't think this is coincidence.

Additional material from another version of this entry

Paragraphs already present above, word for word or nearly so, have been left out. Everything below differs from the text above in at least one reading, date, name or note, and is kept so that no reading is lost.

1780, Entry 3 — Baptism (Linse, miller's family)

German

3\. Linse. Der Mühlenmeister(?) Johann Heinrich Wesemann sein [Sohn/Tochter unleserlich] geboren. Die Mutter [Name unleserlich], alt [Zahl unleserlich(?)] Jahr. Gevattern: [Namen teils unleserlich]. Getauft [Datum unleserlich(?)].

English

3\. Linse. A [son/daughter, illegible] born to the mill-master(?) Johann Heinrich Wesemann. The mother [name illegible], aged [number illegible(?)]. Godparents: [names partly illegible]. Baptized [date illegible(?)].

Transcription (German)

3\) Linse. d. 6ten Jan. der Müller Johann Heinrich Wesemann eine Tochter. Die Mutter Marie Christine, aet. 38. Gev.: der Krüger Settemeier, Sporleder d[e] Linse, dessen Frau. get. d. 11ten ej. Nom. Caroline Louise.

Translation (English)

Linse, 6 January [1789]: to the miller Johann Heinrich Wesemann a daughter. The mother Marie Christine, aged 38. Godparents: the innkeeper Settemeier; Sporleder of Linse [and] his wife. Baptized 11 January. Named Caroline Louise.

Notes

The mother's age reads 38, not 34 as the prior research transcribed it; 38 agrees with Christine's baptism of 1 June 1750 (PROVEN). The Sporleders of Linse stood for the miller's daughter, as he had stood for theirs in 1782 and 1785.